Military-Industrial Complex is alive and well in the post-Cold War era

I'll admit, This story flew below my radar.  Apparently, President Obama announced last September his new policy for missile defense in Europe.  He began his statement this way:

As Commander-in-Chief, I'm committed to doing everything in my power to advance our national security.  And that includes strengthening our defenses against any and all threats to our people, our troops, and our friends and allies around the world.

 

So our national security is at stake with respect to "any and all threats to ... our troops, and our friends and allies around the world."  He makes this statement as if this interpretation of "national security" has always been so.  But it has not.  To say that any "threat" on any of "our friends and allies" is equivalent to a threat on our nation is a stretch to put it mildly.

And what constitutes a "threat"?

... we have updated our intelligence assessment of Iran's missile programs, which emphasizes the threat posed by Iran's short- and medium-range missiles, which are capable of reaching Europe. 

Apparently, some of our crack analysts have information (which we can not share), which in some scenario (which we will not describe), "emphasizes the threat" (won't define what this means) against Europe (not the US). 

OK.  Please continue.

...we have made specific and proven advances in our missile defense technology, particularly with regard to land- and sea-based interceptors and the sensors that support them.  Our new approach will, therefore, deploy technologies that are proven and cost-effective and that counter the current threat, and do so sooner than the previous program.  Because our approach will be phased and adaptive, we will retain the flexibility to adjust and enhance our defenses as the threat and technology continue to evolve.

Oooh...I get chills when we have advances in our technology.  And our approach will be "phased and adaptive", whatever the hell that means.  So, it appears that some defense contractor sold the Chief on some new technology that phases and adapts over a long period of time.  Gotta get some of that!

Go on...

Together we are committed to a broad range of cooperative efforts to strengthen our collective defense, and we are bound by the solemn commitment of NATO's Article V that an attack on one is an attack on all.

Ahh...so we have this treaty that says all for one and one for all.  So I guess this means that everyone chips in to pay for this deployment?  Not according to the Washington Post:

It is a good deal for Europe, which is largely getting the protection for free. 

DOH!!!

So, let me get this straight:
  1. Any threat to our "friends and allies" is a threat to us
  2. Iran poses an imminent "threat" to our allies
  3. Therefore we must spend billions of dollars from the US treasury to protect our friends.
  4. This enhances our National Security
This is a classic example of how the Military Industrial complex works.  It needs to create Enemies and Threats that require spending immense amount of money to fund the technology, systems and materials to defend against. 

Watch and learn.

Filed under  //  american empire   Iran   military-industrial complex   Obama   politics  
Comments (2)
Posted

Obama Gives Panel Six Months to Revise Drilling Rules - NYTimes.com

President Obama established a bipartisan national commission on Friday to investigate what caused the devastating oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico and figure out where the government went wrong so as to “make sure it never happens again,” as he put it.

There is only one way to "make sure this never happens again". And that is to ban oil drilling of the coast of the US. Anything else is pure hubris.

Black swans exist - and anytime someone says they have "addresses all possibilities" run for the hills.

Filed under  //  Obama   off shore drilling   Oil   politics  
Comments (0)
Posted

More on restricting Miranda Rights

This just in from Matt Taibbi:


The point is that this gesture by Eric Holder to drop to his knees and pray at the altar of Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and Sarah Palin is one of those things that both sides are going to end up seriously regretting.
 

Comments (0)
Posted

Meet the New Boss, Same as the Old Boss: Obama Said to Be Open to New Miranda Look

This from the NY Times:

David Axelrod, the top White House political adviser, said Monday that President Obama was amenable to Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr.’s call for a new law allowing interrogators to question terrorism suspects for lengthy periods without informing them of their rights.

This is a strange and disturbing idea.  First of all, any breaching of our civil rights because some bureaucrat "suspects" that we are a terrorist leaves the door wide open for full scale abuse.  No oversight.  No protection.  Scary to contemplate.

Second, we have "Miranda rights" not because of any legislation that was passed.  This is the result of a Supreme Court ruling, not legislation.  How can you create a "new law" which abridges a ruling of the Supreme Court?  I don't see how this is constitutionally possible.

If Bush/Cheney had even suggested this there would have been howls of protest.  Let's hope there is outrage against this coming from Obama - but I won't hold my breath.

Filed under  //  bill of rights   free and civil society   imperial presidency   obama  
Comments (0)
Posted

Obama to Increase NASA budget

We have a $1.3 trillion deficit and our Federal Government is unable to step up to the reality that we can not afford to do everything that we are attempting to do.  Where does NASA sit on the priority list which currently includes Social Security, Medicare, etc?  According to this article, Obama is proposing to increase the NASA budget and have them refocus on human spaceflight.  The cynic in me sees this as a political calculation that goes something like this:  "It worked for Kennedy."

Filed under  //  NASA   Obama  
Comments (0)
Posted