New target of rights erosions: U.S. citizens - Glenn Greenwald - Salon.com

The most recent liberty-abridging, Terrorism-justified controversies have focused on diluting the legal rights of American citizens (in part because the rights of non-citizens are largely gone already and there are none left to attack).  A bipartisan group from Congress sponsors legislation to strip Americans of their citizenship based on Terrorism accusations.  Barack Obama claims the right to assassinate Americans far from any battlefield and with no due process of any kind.  The Obama administration begins covertly abandoning long-standing Miranda protections for American suspects by vastly expanding what had long been a very narrow "public safety" exception, and now Eric Holder explicitly advocates legislation to codify that erosion.  John McCain and Joe Lieberman introduce legislation to bar all Terrorism suspects, including Americans arrested on U.S. soil, from being tried in civilian courts, and former Bush officials Bill Burck and Dana Perino -- while noting (correctly) that Holder's Miranda proposal constitutes a concession to the right-wing claim that Miranda is too restrictive -- today demand that U.S. citizens accused of Terrorism and arrested on U.S. soil be treated as enemy combatants and thus denied even the most basic legal protections (including the right to be charged and have access to a lawyer).

And so it goes.

Filed under  //  bill of rights   Imperial Presidency  
Comments (0)
Posted

More on restricting Miranda Rights

This just in from Matt Taibbi:


The point is that this gesture by Eric Holder to drop to his knees and pray at the altar of Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and Sarah Palin is one of those things that both sides are going to end up seriously regretting.
 

Comments (0)
Posted

Meet the New Boss, Same as the Old Boss: Obama Said to Be Open to New Miranda Look

This from the NY Times:

David Axelrod, the top White House political adviser, said Monday that President Obama was amenable to Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr.’s call for a new law allowing interrogators to question terrorism suspects for lengthy periods without informing them of their rights.

This is a strange and disturbing idea.  First of all, any breaching of our civil rights because some bureaucrat "suspects" that we are a terrorist leaves the door wide open for full scale abuse.  No oversight.  No protection.  Scary to contemplate.

Second, we have "Miranda rights" not because of any legislation that was passed.  This is the result of a Supreme Court ruling, not legislation.  How can you create a "new law" which abridges a ruling of the Supreme Court?  I don't see how this is constitutionally possible.

If Bush/Cheney had even suggested this there would have been howls of protest.  Let's hope there is outrage against this coming from Obama - but I won't hold my breath.

Filed under  //  bill of rights   free and civil society   imperial presidency   obama  
Comments (0)
Posted